Author Archives: gdewar

Oh No She Didn’t: Latest Hillary Hyperbole Invokes Kennedy Assassination!

Sen. Clinton continues to make the case that a) her campaign is over and b) she just doesn’t have the temperament to be president when things don’t go entirely her way. (Mind you, we have many qualified women who can be president who do possess the intellect and judgment to be president, they’re just not running this year. Which is unfortunate).
Lately, she’s been prone to comparing her (broke as Hell) campaign to things like the Civil Rights Movement of the 60s, Rwanda, Zimbabwe (you know where all those people died) and so on. Today, she hit a new low, the same week we learned of Sen. Ted Kennedy’s brain tumor, when she cited the assassination of Robert Kennedy in California as a reason her campaign should go on.
No, really. In addition to all the other tacky statements she’s made, in addtion to the virulent racism of her supporters like Geraldine Ferraro, in addition to race baiting, she said that.
This week.
The same week we heard about Ted Kennedy’s tumor.
A few weeks from the 40th Anniversary of Bobby’s assassination.
Hillary for President? Hell no. She’s no longer some sort of bold leader of whatever. She is behaving like a psycho ex girlfriend, but this time she wants her finger on the nuclear button.

Continue reading

Just What IS A “DCCC” And Why Are You Voting For It?

More than a few people I know have asked me just what is this “DCCC” they keep getting mailers, emails, and the like as we approach the primary. Sifting through the pros and cons of so many candidates is not easy, especially if it’s not clear why it is a) someone is running for it b) why someone is running for it when the job does not pay and c) why they have to run and get elected by the voters at all.
The Democratic County Central Committee is the official party organization for the County of San Francisco. (For the record, there is also a Republican County Central Committee as well, which also has many candidates running and sending out mail – there’s just not as many Rs in SF as there are D’s, that’s all). Now, this in and of itself is somewhat interesting to those in politics, but it can make a difference, particularly with registering new voters and getting them out to vote. In addition to the elected members from both Assembly districts, Democratic elected officeholders also have a seat on the committee as well.
The DCCC can make endorsements, which are the Official Word of the Democratic Party in SF, and can raise money to distribute mail, literature, register voters, and so on. It is not a very glamorous job, nor is it one that the public gets to see. But having seen both totally moronic and totally effective local parties, and the impact they can have, I can safely say having one that at least gets people to vote and makes sure to register new voters as people move here is the least they can do.
This year has an unusual wrinkle, in that several elected officials (termed out Sups. Peskin and McGoldrick, and current Sup. Chris Daly) are running for a job that is usually held by party activists, and not professional politicians. Likewise, several people hoping to serve on the Board of Supervisors after this fall’s elections (Emily Drennen, Eric Mar, David Campos, David Chiu, Eric Quezada) are running this year. David Chiu is unique in that he currently serves the unexpired term of the late Sue Bierman, and is running as an incumbent.
In addition to these “celebrity” candidates, there are incumbent DCCC members running, as well as new people who want to get involved. The argument made by Daly and company is that electing people like him and his cohorts who a) have name ID and b) can raise money and have “experience” can help make the DCCC more powerful, and more (ahem) progressive.
The counter-argument is that while such points may be the case, the DCCC has traditionally been the place for the citizen activist to get their first chance to get involved in politics, and perhaps run for office later on. Having professional politicians pushes them to the back of the bus, so to speak, and may mean for a DCCC that is more like the Board of Supervisors.
Which view is right? I don’t know, I can see both sides, frankly. However, I would wonder what would be the impact of having a significant number of currently serving board members (with all the work that entails) also serving concurrently as members of the DCCC.
We’ll see what happens when voters have their say in June. Until then, read read read all that mail and be sure to vote!

Why I’m Voting Yes on A and B, and NO on Everything Else….

I’ve never been a big fan of ballot measures. Once the last resort for a distressed citizen to get a social ill addressed by government, they’ve now become the first weapon for special interests with money to jam all sorts of bizarro spending and borrowing into government, often with paved Road-To-Hell like results.
Living in San Francisco affords one the benefit (!) of voting on even more of these things, which more often than not are simply “advisory” measures with absolutely no power – a sort of civic primal scream against whatever a few thousand signatures wanna scream against.
In a way, it makes voting that much easier since I pretty much vote “no” on all ballot measures, especially bonds, the leading cause of budget woes, and yet, the most popular of measures. Every year there are pleas to vote for “more money” for worthy causes and the like, and yet no one ever stops and wonders where this “free money” comes from. It ain’t free – it’s borrowed money at high interest rates. If you want to know part of the reason civic budgets are always out of whack – it’s because they have tons of bond debt service to pay.
For June, I’m keeping it easy and simple. I’m voting “Yes” on A and B here in San Francisco, only because they’re trying to fix something. “A” tries to address the problem of paying teachers in one of the most expensive parts of the country in as best a way as possible under current rules, and “B” is a housekeeping measure to fix some problem with pensions and the like. Fine, I’ll vote for ’em.
As for the rest, I’m voting a nice big “NO” on all of ’em. Most of these things are either political grudges gone wild and a waste of the paper they’re printed on, or they’re things that just aren’t that trustworthy. Since I was not part of the dream team that got paid by Lennar to pass Proposition “G” (and because I’m worried a company with so many financial problems would be given a piece of Our City), I’m voting NO.
I’m also voting NO on F, because while the intentions may be honorable, the stream of “Frak You’s” I get from its supporters have convinced me they already have enough votes to win, and don’t need mine. (Odd way to win an election, kids!).
As for the infamous Props. 98/99 – a big NO on both of them too. Classic special interest big bucks buying a way onto the ballot. Unless a state ballot measure really does what it says or revolutionizes our arcane budget process in ways we honestly need, I always vote NO on all state ballot measures.
I don’t care if it’s some Worthy Cause with ads that make you cry like you’re watching a Hallmark ad or a Lifetime TV Movie, I say no! We pay a Legislature and a Governor a lot of money to pass laws – they should be doing that, instead of running around paying for lavish trips with special interest campaign dollars.
Remember, your ballot is taxpayer financed fun. If you find yourself bored with some of the more arcane races, feel free to write in names as you feel appropriate…or for more fun, bullet-vote for your favorite candidates for Democratic Central Committee! Enjoy!

The Usual Suspects has All Sorts of Direct Mail Goodness Online.

Well that certainly didn’t work out, did it?
I think I must be on a direct mail blacklist, because I’ve never gone through an election and received a handful of mailers before….so aside from the few I’d planned to scan in this week, I have very few pieces to dissect.
However, the patriotic citizens of SF Usual Suspects, who pioneered this concept some time ago, have an extensive archive of direct mail online to read, dissect, and so on. Enjoy!

Ok, Now I’m Begging: Got Political Junk Mail? Send it Over To Me!

I never thought the day would come when I would not be getting an assortment of political junk mail, but, for some reason this year I’ve received maybe 4 pieces, total. I get more mail from the folks who run LinuxWorld or the good people at Netflix than from the many causes and candidates.
So, now I’m begging – if you’re getting buried under piles of appeals for people running for DCCC, State Senate, or whatever, email me and let me know what you have, and I can either arrange to pick something up or you could just send me a JPEG of the many dead trees in your recycle bin.
What little I have will be scanned and placed in this year’s Direct Mail Disinfo Rehab Archive, but the more the better! At this rate, all I’ll have to debunk are a few flyers and the endless email spam a certain out-of-town candidate for Congress keeps bombarding me with.

Today in Election WTF: Whiny Flyers In the News Racks

For a while now I’ve been seeing these ink-jetted flyers inserted in newsracks, mostly in Guardian racks, around town.

What’s not immediately obvious is whether these anonymous little missives are pro Pelosi/Sandoval/Migden, or anti Pelosi/Sandoval/Migden? They really could go either way – yet another example of how the Entitled Left in town loves to make noise, but hasn’t quite figured out how to do so in a way that makes sense to Regular Folks.

I’m guessing it’s the latter, but I could be wrong.

When Did Anyone Ever Expect to Read the Words “Hillary Clinton” and “Longshot Campaign” in the Same Sentence?

Whilst reading the breaking news that John Edwards finally endorse Barack Obama (AFTER the North Carolina primary), I have to say I was more than a bit surprised to read this:

Democrat John Edwards is endorsing former rival Barack Obama, fresh signs of the party establishment embracing the likely nominee even as Hillary Rodham Clinton refuses to give up her long-shot candidacy.

Now, mind you, I was never one to simply assume Mrs. Clinton had this thing pwned from the beginning, but many other people did, and made their choices as appropriate. Now, Bill and Hillary are personally in debt, have $20 million in general election campaign money they can’t spend, and have pulled out all the stops to block Barry, all to no avail. Up against a guy who most people hadn’t even heard of just a few years ago.
Go figure. That’s almost as baffling as the state Senate incumbent with a warchest full of cash and an array of Sacramento insiders running the show, now running third in a three way race. Strange how a year changes things.

Speed Racer Friday Fun! UPDATED!

It’s Friday, and it’s the big day for the weirdest remake I’ve heard of, Speed Racer. To celebrate the movie a few links…first from the always awesome io9.com sci fi blog we have this clip of the original, non-dubbed opening of Speed Racer…

and of course the SNL parody with George Clooney:

The LA Times has this really interesting set of pictures, with comments from the set designers, too that’s worth checking out.
Coming up soon: Disinfo Rehab Mail for the Primary Election, Decoding the DCCC Elections, and more. Don’t forget to check out my other site at Adama for President as well!
UPDATE Somehow, the good citizens at Hulu.com managed to discover this humble blog, and alerted me to the fact you can watch dubbed version of Old School Speed Racer online!
The fact that someone, anyone even reads this blog, much less made the effort to alert me to this, well it just made what was a crappy Friday much better. (oh and while I watched this as a kid I forgot the southern-style songsters who did the original theme song…)

And to continue the fun, here’s the version of Sponge’s tribute to the OG Speed Racer theme in English, mashed up with snippets from the new movie..

Tired Catch Phrase of the Day: “Agent of Change” vs. “Agent of C.H.A.N.G.E.”

250px-MarvelShield.jpg
Every political season we get a mix of the tried-and-true soundbits**, and we get a few new ones that the Smart People decide really “click” with the voters and use them, ad nauseam, on every single campaign from president to dog-catcher.
Today, I want to make a plea to politicians, politickers, and whatnots in the Big Media to please take a flamethrower to the dossiers and computers that suggested one use the term “agent of change” in any political related materials, now and forevermore.
It’s a meaningless phrase, tossed around even more so as the One Guy who talked about Change suddenly got popular, and then suddenly EVERYONE wanted to Talk About Change, and How They’re an Agent of it.
Folks, unless you are literally an Agent of C.H.A.N.G.E. (Cannibalistic Humanoid Aboveground Nuclear Germanic Enemas), CONTROL, SPECTRE, or some other spy-related organization with the cool logo and gun to prove it, please, find a new way to talk about your tireless work on the amendment to subsidize puppies and rainbows.
Please.
Think of the Children.
**Note: I meant to say “soundbits” not “soundbites,” so grammar/spelling posse, put away the rope and the branding iron. Please?

Too Clever by Half – HuffPo Headlines Go Nuclear! o hai!

Sometimes, a screenshot says it all. Like this one, which has 2 popular storries on the Huffington Post (sigh)…one about Hillary Clinton’s fight for the delegates to win the nomination…the other about a horrible human tragedy with lots of dead people.

Hmm.

Memo to newsniks and the like: Watch it with the cutesy clever “o hai me so smart” headlines…you never know where they’ll end up.